home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1500 / 1500p017.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  60KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | bulletin board | reckoner | sky
OCR: Summary of the Argument This Court should Court of Appeals because this Court has never held and should now hold. that the Double Jeopardy Clause applies non-capital sentence erhancement proceedings. Indeed, this Court has previously declined to extend the Double Jeopardy Clause to non- -capital sentence enhancement proceedings, United sarnis DiFrancesco, U.S {1980) and expressly reserved this issue in Lockhart Nelson 488 U.s 37 n.6 (1988) This Court's expressed justifications for extending the Double Jeopardy Clause capital senteneing proceedings Bullington Missouri. 451 U.s 430 {1981} not exist non-capital sentenoe enhancement prixeedings. Thus. the Court of Appeals' application of Bullingtan to this case JO1O Extension of the Double Jeopardy Clause to -uou capital sentence enhancement p ...